Rating: PG
Star Rating: 4 out of 5
~ ~ ~
I have to say that I was pleasantly suprised when I watched this last night. This 1938 rendition of the classic tale of Robin Hood was actually pretty well done for its time and stayed primarily true to the story. It did help, though, to have had Mom read Howard Pyle's version to us, for it was rather neat to watch a scene and remember it from the actual book.
~ ~ ~
There are several moments of inappropriate romance (that is, if you're courtship-minded) between Robin Hood and Maid Marian, but besides this, there isn't any objectionable content.~ ~ ~
The movie mainly focuses on the exploits of Robin Hood against his Norman rival, Sir Guy of Gisbourne. Robin, made an outlaw by his enemies, gathers about his person a band of followers who aid him him in his endeavors to "steal from the rich to give to the poor".~ ~ ~
The scenes of swordplay, though not very realistic, were fun to watch (what do you expect? I'm a young man!). The movie is rated PG, but really the fighting is no more graphic or violent than in a movie like Davy Crockett: King of the Wild Frontier.~ ~ ~
Another thing that might be noted is that Maid Marian, like all the other women in the film, actually wears something modest, unlike in so many of today's films, where the women decide to wear their bathing suits on set!~ ~ ~
One thing we might consider, though, is the godliness of Robin Hood's tactics as the hero of the poor. Is it right to steal from someone, even if they did take the wealth they have wrongfully? Is it right to repay evil with evil? God tells us that vengence belongs to Him, and to Him alone, and that we are not to take revenge into our own hands (Rom. 12:19). I think that it is an interesting topic to discuss, because it seems that Robin Hood is no longer thought of as as being wrong in his actions. Is he to be excused from obeying the seventh commandment? We need to call sin by its true name: SIN. It is wrong to excuse or glorify it. There is no getting around it, and so, whether we like it or not, we must recognize Robin and his merry men for what they were: thieves, plain and simple. Even if the Normans extorted money wrongfully from the poor, was it Robin's duty to take vengence and reccompence into his own hands? I'd really like to hear your thoughts on this. There's much more to discuss than is possible in this review.Persevero,
Scribe
